DMOZ: Rotten To
The Core
I knew things were bad at DMOZ. But I guess I didn't realize
how bad, until I started eavesdropping on a few forums, and
reading the avalanche of e-mails I received on the subject.
When it takes up to two years to get a web site listed, there's
a serious problem. When perfectly qualified web sites are
rejected for no other reason than the fact the editor considers
them serious competition to his or her own site, there's a
serious problem.
When you e-mail DMOZ about the status of your web site and don't
even receive a courtesy response to your questions, there's
a serious problem.
When you have egotistical DMOZ editors fighting each other
to have their own web sites listed, there's a serious problem.
And quite frankly, I don't see how the mess DMOZ has created
can be fixed. With an apparently endless backlog of web sites
waiting to be approved, how can they possibly catch up. The
answer is, they can't.
But this isn't just a performance issue we're talking about
here, this is a morality issue. The very fact that it's a
matter of public record what DMOZ is doing speaks volumes
about the character of many of their editors.
After all, much of what I've written negatively about DMOZ
came directly from the mouths and/or keyboards of DMOZ editors
themselves. At least they claimed to be DMOZ editors. And
for the life of me, I can't imagine why anyone would want
to own up to that dubious distinction, unless it were actually
true.
This is what one DMOZ editor had to say. "Since I became
an editor for DMOZ a few weeks ago (albeit for a tiny category)
I have seen on the DMOZ editors board that there are a lot
of good volunteers there who work hard to try to keep the
directory up to date and useful. Its a shame because there
are also seem to be a lot of editors there who are lazy, or
who have let the "power" of being an editor go to their heads.
(The people who DON'T ever post on the editor message boards,
or update their categories, etc.)
I think some method to allow webmasters to check the status
of their site submissions (and to know why their site gets
rejected if it is something fixable, and the site is related
to the category and not just a spam submission, etc) would
be an excellent first step to improving the system. Unfortunately
the editor management system seems to be circa 1998 ... I
am only guessing based on design/functionality, but I assume
big changes are not coming any time soon."
Even Google may have come to the realization that DMOZ may
have finally run its course. Previously found via its own
tab, the Open Directory has been demoted to the "more" page.
This was Google's explanation for the demotion. "We analyzed
what people were using, and that had become less popular over
time. As the web grows, directory structures get harder to
use. It didn't seem to be worth the real estate on the home
page." Ouch!
Demoting the directory may also be a way for Google to eventually
distance itself from the Open Directory Project, which powers
it. The volunteer-produced directory was added back in 2000,
near the height of the Open Directory's popularity.
Today, there are often complaints that the ODP, has not keep
up with submission demands. In addition, there have been delays
in getting the most current data out in a format that ODP
partners such as Google can use.
Ultimately, any problem with the Open Directory--which is
not in Google's control--still reflects badly on Google.
I do have a solution to this whole DMOZ mess, if anyone wants
to hear it. I say nuke the site for morbid, and put it out
of its misery!
If you are thinking of buying an
SEO software application, here are some programs that actually
work as advertised and the reason why they are recommended
by FreeSEOTutorials.com
Seo
Elite: New Seo Software! The Grand Daddy
Of All Seo Software! Get A Top 5 Google Ranking In Under
30 Days!
www.SEOElite.com |
| |
| |
Still haven't found what you're looking for?
Search below to find what you need:
|
